Campaigns · 26 September 2026
What Refill teaches brands about making sustainable action visible
Refill connected an environmental message to places where people could act. Its design is instructive — and so are the limits of its impact claims.
By María José Ospina · 4 min read

In this article
A campaign can persuade people to care about waste and still fail at the moment of action. Refill is useful because its central idea was not only to change attitudes. It connected a behaviour — carrying and refilling a container — to places where that behaviour could happen.
A campaign built around an available action
City to Sea says it was home to Refill for ten years, from a Bristol pilot in 2015 until 2025. The current Refill Return site dates the app’s launch to 2016. That small difference matters editorially: when sources describe a programme’s origin differently, the responsible choice is to preserve both accounts rather than manufacture a single anniversary.
The model is clear. Participating businesses and public locations can appear in an app, while a physical sign tells people that a refill is available. The original remit began with free drinking water and expanded to coffee cups, lunch boxes and groceries. In 2025, City to Sea transferred the initiative to Ecosurety, which now operates it as Refill Return.
This combination makes the campaign more than a message. The app answers “where?”, the participating location supplies the service, and the sign answers “can I do this here?” at the point of action.
The infrastructure carries the message
Many environmental campaigns begin with a broad instruction: use less plastic, waste less or choose better. Those ambitions are easy to agree with and difficult to perform. They leave the audience to design the next step.
Refill narrows the gap. Its communication names a repeatable action and points to an available location. The sticker matters because asking for water or approaching an unfamiliar refill point can create social friction. A visible invitation removes some uncertainty before the conversation begins.
The map does a different job. It turns isolated participating venues into a network that can be searched. For a campaign, that is a powerful shift: the audience is not only asked to remember a value but given a route to act on it.

Reach is not the same as avoided packaging
The current operator reports more than 30,000 public taps on the app and says thousands of locations are listed. These are useful indicators of availability, but they are operator-reported figures. They do not show how often each point is used, whether a refill replaced a single-use purchase or how much packaging was avoided because of campaign communication.
City to Sea has also published larger cumulative claims for the programme. Those claims are not treated here as independently verified environmental outcomes because the public pages reviewed do not provide the calculation, comparison period and attribution method needed to test them.
This boundary does not make the campaign unimportant. It makes the measurement question more precise. A location count measures infrastructure. App registrations measure access or interest. Logged refills measure recorded actions. Avoided packaging requires an additional assumption about what would otherwise have been bought or discarded.
A strong environmental story should not merge those stages into one headline.
Scale introduces operational limits
WRAP’s current guidance says reusable and refillable packaging systems face consumer reluctance, hygiene or contamination concerns, supply-chain logistics and the need for critical mass. These are not side issues for the communications team. They shape what the campaign can honestly ask people to do.
A beautifully designed invitation will not compensate for an empty dispenser, unclear pricing, unsuitable containers or staff who have not been briefed. Equally, an operational refill offer can remain invisible if the customer cannot recognise it at the shelf, entrance or point of sale.
The campaign and the service therefore need the same owner map. Who maintains the listing? Who checks the sign? Who explains the process? Who records use? Who corrects a public claim when the evidence changes?
A practical decision for smaller businesses
Before commissioning an environmental headline, define three connected elements:
1. The action
State exactly what the customer can do: refill a particular product, return a container or borrow a reusable item. “Choose sustainability” is not an instruction.
2. The route
Show where, when and how the action works. A campaign asset, product page and staff explanation should describe the same process.
3. The proof
Choose a measure that matches the claim. Record refill transactions, quantities dispensed, repeat use and the packaging purchased during a defined comparison period. Keep estimates separate from observed figures.
There is a counterpoint. Not every neighbourhood business needs an app, and sophisticated measurement can become disproportionate. A simple sign, a consistent process and a monthly record may be enough. The principle is not to copy Refill’s scale. It is to connect the promise, the service and the evidence.
The business decision is whether the organisation is ready to operate the behaviour it wants to advertise. If the route is unclear or the record has no owner, the next investment should be in the service design — not a louder green claim.
Sources
0 likes
0 comments
Working on something this applies to? Tell us.
Start a project